Legal Opinion
Davis v. Perdue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 18, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2017-0245Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROSETTA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-245 (TJK) TOM VILSACK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rosetta Davis, a former Department of Agriculture employee, brings several claims under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act. According to Davis, the Department engaged in a campaign of harassment and retaliation against her for protected activity and because of her disabilities. The Department moves for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the motion as to all counts except for Count III, which…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.