Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Sobiech
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), in this action seeks payment of freight charges for 26 shipments of onions. Defendant Ted Sobiech (“Sobiech”), the consignee of the shipments, has counterclaimed for damage or loss with respect to certain shipments. Plaintiff seeks an order pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure granting (1) partial summa ry judgment with respect to certain counterclaims on the ground that they are barred as a matter of law under the pertinent contracts of carriage; and (2) summary judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hawkins v. SteingutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Yamazen U.S.A., Inc. v. Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company and Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chartis Seguros Mexico, S.A. de C.V. v. HLI Rail & Rigging, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Sompo Japan Insurance Co. of America v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- C.R. England & Sons, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- Jessica Howard Ltd. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Jessica Howard Ltd. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003