Legal Opinion

C.R. England & Sons, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 24, 1996No. 3:95-cv-03199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SANDERS, District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed March 11, 1996; Plaintiff’s Response, filed March 26, 1996; and Defendant’s Reply, filed April 15, 1996. Also before the Court .is Plaintiff’s Objections to the Affidavit of A.D. Powell (“Powell”). 1

I. BACKGROUND

The material facts in this case are not in dispute. On May 19, 1994, Plaintiff C.R. England and Sons, Inc. (“England and Sons”) and Defendant The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (“ATSF”) entered into a contract of carriage governed by ATSF Circular Intermodal No. 1 (the “Circular”)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Ferrostaal, Inc. v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
Gulf Rice Arkansas, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005