Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Richard Bockman Land Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 8, 1973No. 1643-1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The Richard Bockman Land Corporation was convicted at jury trial of violating a Seattle ordinance which requires floating homes to be connected to the city’s. sewer system. The city presented uncontroverted evidence that four floating homes owned by Bockman were not connected.

Bockman first claims that the trial judge’s instructions failed to place upon the city the burden of proving “each material element of fact beyond a reasonable doubt.” Instruction No. 1 concludes with the following sentence: “The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LyskoskiWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brown v. HebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. State v. BreckenridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. RahnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Goodman v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. State v. SchimmelpfennigWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Spokane v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API