Legal Opinion

Oswald v. WEINER

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 15, 1950No. 16430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

This appeal relates to demurrer to the complaint by the defendant, David Weiner. The complaint alleged that he was the owner of an automobile which was operated for the purposes of his business by the other defendant who was demurrant’s brother and agent. The latter invited plain tiff’s intestate, who was her daughter, to ride with him on a business trip. In the course of it he operated the automobile negligently, willfully, wantonly, recklessly and unlawfully, in specified particulars, whereby the automobile and a railway train were in collision, and the intestate received…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fulghum v. BleakleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Cummings v. TweedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Spurlin v. Colprovia Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Ralls v. SaleebySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Peak v. FrippSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elrod v. AllSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Bailey v. SEYMORESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API