Legal Opinion

Bailey v. SEYMORE

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 28, 1953No. 16781Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

This is an action for damages for the pain and suffering of plaintiff’s intestate. It is alleged in the complaint that he was fatally injured in a highway accident in the Town of Westminster, in this State, on September 16, 1952. Other allegations are to the effect that the appellant Seymore was engaged in public transportation of property and the appellant Insurance Company had posted with the Public Service Commission the required bond or insurance policy of indemnity for liability for personal injuries and death. Negligence, in stated particulars, is alleged; but the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulghum v. BleakleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Cummings v. TweedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Spurlin v. Colprovia Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Ralls v. SaleebySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Peak v. FrippSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API