Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 26, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

For the purposes of this appeal this suit may be thus accurately described:

The appellee Montgomery sued C. P. F. Looney in debt and foreclosure as the maker of a note in the principal sum of $150, dated March 1, 1890, due two years after date, retaining the vendor’s lien on lots-3 and 4, block 35, in the town of Vernon, Texas. E. P. Rutherford, J. G. Abney, and J. R. Ponder were made defendants as subsequent purchasers of lot 4. William Cameron & Co., a firm composed of William Cameron, W. P. Brazzleton, C. L. Johnson, G. M. Bowie and R. H. Bowman, were made defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Reese v. MedlockTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Clayton v. MooringTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. JoinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. McLeod v. Morrison & EshelmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Liberto v. SandersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Gilliland v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Salopek v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API