Legal Opinion
Roscoe v. Goodale
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1951No. Civ. 7931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order, denying an alternative writ of mandate and dismissing the petition therefor. After the briefs had been filed and prior to the date set for the oral argument, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the question presented has now become moot.
The petition for the writ alleged that the city of Eureka was organized and exists under a freeholders’ charter and that the respondents are the duly elected councilmen; that petitioner, appellant here, is the duly elected, qualified and acting city engineer and also a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- George v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Spotton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Zagoren v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Crangle v. City Council of Crescent CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Grant v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Terry v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kriebel v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.