Legal Opinion

Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 24, 2019No. 1:18-cv-02188Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. and Oakley, ) Inc., ) Case No. 18 CV 2188 ) Plaintiffs, ) Judge Joan B. Gottschall v. ) ) The Partnerships and Unincorporated ) Associations Identified on Schedule “A,” ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs own several trademarks related to Ray-Ban- and Oakley-branded sunglasses, clothing, and accessories. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 12, 20, ECF No. 12. They brought this suit under the Lanham Act,

15 U.S.C. § 1051

et seq., and the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Practices Act, 815…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Water Splash, Inc. v. MenonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Cardenas v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API