Neil v. Neil
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The court retains jurisdiction of a suit involving the custody of minors. In a sense a decree or order of court awarding the custody and maintenance of minors is never final. It is subject to change to suit the changing conditions and require*65ments of the minor and of the custodian: Section 514, Or. L., as amended by Chapter 114, Laws of 1921; Jolliffe v. Jolliffe, 107 Or. 33 (213 Pac. 415; Hertzen v. Hertzen, 104 Or. 423 (208 Pac. 580); Mack v. Mack, 91 Or. 514 (179 Pac. 557); Gibbons v. Gibbons, 75 Or. 500 (147 Pac. 530).
While the affidavit of the plaintiff supporting her motion for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mack v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Gibbons v. GibbonsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Hertzen v. HertzenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Jolliffe v. JolliffeOregon Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Picker v. VollenhoverOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Wells v. Wells-CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Gibson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Gallagher v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Gregory v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.