Legal Opinion

Neil v. Neil

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The court retains jurisdiction of a suit involving the custody of minors. In a sense a decree or order of court awarding the custody and maintenance of minors is never final. It is subject to change to suit the changing conditions and require*65ments of the minor and of the custodian: Section 514, Or. L., as amended by Chapter 114, Laws of 1921; Jolliffe v. Jolliffe, 107 Or. 33 (213 Pac. 415; Hertzen v. Hertzen, 104 Or. 423 (208 Pac. 580); Mack v. Mack, 91 Or. 514 (179 Pac. 557); Gibbons v. Gibbons, 75 Or. 500 (147 Pac. 530).

While the affidavit of the plaintiff supporting her motion for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mack v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Gibbons v. GibbonsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hertzen v. HertzenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jolliffe v. JolliffeOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Picker v. VollenhoverOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wells v. Wells-CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gibson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gallagher v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Gregory v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API