Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells-Crawford

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Defendant refers to the fact that she is not charged either in the divorce proceeding, or in the proceedings to modify the decree, with any delinquency. It is admitted that she has been at all times a good mother and has taken proper care of her children. Since the divorce each of the parties has remarried. Both now live in La Grande, Oregon. Defendant has married R. A. Crawford, a respectable and prosperous citizen of La Grande, who owns and provides defendant with a good home. Plaintiff married one Hazel Barnes and is living in a rented house. Plaintiff and his present wife have one child.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brandt v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Burns v. ShapleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Merges v. MergesOregon Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hurner v. HurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Peterson v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Leverich v. LeverichOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Gonyea v. GonyeaOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Henrickson v. HenricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API