Legal Opinion

Esch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.

The appellant was the owner of lot 30, in block 86, in the city of Milwaukee, being a parcel of land 50 feet on the east side of Second street and 150 feet deep, lying between Clybourn and Fowler streets. The delend-ant company condemned for depot purposes 55 feet average width off the rear end of the lot, leaving it 50 by 95 feet, upon which there were buildings. The plaintiff appealed from the award of the commissioners, and in the circuit court recovered less damages than had been awarded him. The issue on the trial was of course the value of the strip taken and the damage to the residue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Snyder v. Western Union RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Seefeld v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Guyandot Valley R'y Co. v. BuskirkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Jeffery v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API