Adams v. US Air, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this appeal, Karl Adams, the plaintiff, contends that the trial court erred when it entered summary judgment against him in an action to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress and interference with contractual relations, based upon Adams’ discharge from employment in the reservations operation for USAir, Inc. (USAir). Named as defendants, in addition to USAir, were Frank Allen, the director of reservations services, and N.A. Lanzilotti, a senior director of reservations offices. Allen had notified Adams of his discharge from employment following an internal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Nix v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Papa v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning RR, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County2001
- Adams v. US Air, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022