Waggoner v. Ace Hardware Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
953 P.2d 88 (1998)
134 Wash.2d 748
Wayne WAGGONER and Kathey Cyr, Respondents,
v.
ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Petitioner.
No. 65079-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 10, 1997.
Decided March 26, 1998.
Lofland & Associates, Gary E. Lofland, Yakima, for Petitioner.
Prediletto, Halpin, Scharnikow & Smart, David L. Trick, Yakima, David Putney, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondent.
SANDERS, Justice.
Wayne Waggoner and Kathey Cyr claim Ace Hardware Corporation engaged in prohibited marital status discrimination by enforcing its employment policy against related, cohabiting…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Talmadge; Concurrence · Durham.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Overton v. Economic Assistance AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Kastanis v. Educational Employees Credit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Aponte v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- McCoy v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- McCoy v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.