Legal Opinion

McCoy v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1998No. 65549-9PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

Respondent James McCoy’s product liability suit against petitioners American Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor Company, Ltd. (Suzuki) was dismissed by summary judgment. The Court of Appeals re*353versed and reinstated the claim. We affirm the Court of Appeals, but on different grounds, and remand for trial.

The issues are (1) whether the rescue doctrine may be invoked in a product liability action; (2) whether a plaintiff asserting a claim as a rescuer under the rescue doctrine must still prove his injuries were proximately caused by defendant’s allegedly tortious conduct; and, if so, (3)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Micro Enhancement v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Micro Enhancement International, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API