Legal Opinion
Turner & Boisseau, Chtd. v. Marshall Adjusting Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 13, 1991No. 86-6000-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
This action is brought by Turner and Boisseau, Chtd., to recover legal fees which Turner & Boisseau claims are owed by the defendants. The central issues of this case concern contract and agency law. It is undisputed that Turner & Boisseau represented certain insureds of Transit Casualty Company (Transit), including two cases known as Morales v. City of Garden City (“Morales”) and Savard v. City of Hutchinson (“Savard”). In 1985 Transit was placed in receivership. Turner & Boisseau brings this action to collect the fees it claims to have earned in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Highland Lumber Co., Inc. v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Steele v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chanute Production Credit Ass'n v. Schicke (In Re Schicke)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- In Re the Appeal of Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Kindergartners Count, Inc. v. DeMoulinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Deere & Co. v. LoyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Memorial Hospital v. Carrier Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.