Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 27, 2017No. CASE NO. C17–0087–JCCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20), Plaintiff's cross-motion for *1337summary judgment (Dkt. No. 34), and Plaintiff's motion to supplement the administrative record (Dkt. No. 23). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary and hereby DENIES Defendant's motion for summary judgment, GRANTS Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment in part, and DENIES Plaintiff's motion to supplement the administrative record…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Breitwieser v. Vail Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Sorensen v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API