Breitwieser v. Vail Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALBERT BREITWIESER, No. 2:21-cv-00568-DJC-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 VAIL CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Albert Breitwieser brought the present action under the Employee 18 Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) based on a denial of health care benefits by 19 Defendant Vail Corporation. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for 20 Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 14). 21 For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is 22 GRANTED. 23 BACKGROUND 24 This…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Federación De Maestros De Puerto Rico v. Junta De Relaciones Del Trabajo De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.