Legal Opinion
Sorensen v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 14, 2022No. 4:21-cv-00286Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO JILL ANN SORENSEN, Case No. 4:21-cv-00286 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY aka THE HARTFORD, Defendant. I INTRODUCTION On June 30, 2021, Plaintiff Jill Ann Sorensen (“Sorensen”) filed suit against The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“The Harford”), alleging that The Hartford wrongfully denied Sorensen long-term disability benefits under the benefit plan, established by Sorensen’s employer, Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc., and pursuant to the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jack FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kathryn L. Benecke v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.