Legal Opinion

State v. Harvey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1985No. 8517SC49PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The threshold question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge properly considered grounds for the suppression motion which were not contained in the motion itself.

General Statute 15A-977(a) dictates that all motions to suppress evidence must contain the grounds which defendant asserts as the basis of the motion. The motion presented by defendant in this case focused on the involuntary nature of defendant’s statements. The trial judge, on the other hand, based his decision granting the motion on the failure of the police to give the warnings required by Miranda for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re ButtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. TarltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API