Legal Opinion

State v. Tarlton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2001No. COA00-761PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a license checkpoint stop. Based on the reasoning stated herein, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

On 9 April 1999, Troopers Kubas and Slemenda of the North Carolina State Highway Patrol conducted a driver’s license checkpoint on Orange Grove Road in Orange County. Drew Allen Tarlton (defendant) was stopped at the checkpoint and Trooper Kubas (Kubas) checked his license and registration. While doing so, Kubas noticed that defendant had a “mild odor of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VeazeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re ButtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Swink v. WeintraubCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API