Legal Opinion

People v. Nunez

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven W. Fisher, J.

The issue presented on this motion involves the operation and effect of the so-called "inspect and reduce” statutes enacted in 1990 (CPL 210.20 [1-a], [6]).

Under prior law, a defendant’s only available challenge to the sufficiency of Grand Jury evidence lay in a motion to inspect and dismiss. The court was powerless to act, however, unless an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes revealed that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient to establish not only the offense charged but any lesser included offense as well (CPL 210.20 [1] [b];…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. Green, New York County Courts1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API