Legal Opinion
State v. Madore
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 27, 2006No. AC 26155PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Roland G. Madore, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a joint jury trial, of one count of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly granted the state’s motion to consolidate his case with that of his brother and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. From approximately…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. BellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Victor C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. ErvinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. James E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. MadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006