Legal Opinion
Mumma v. Town of Brewster
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 14, 1933No. 24372. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Appellants, as citizens and taxpayers of the town of Brewster, sought by this action to enjoin the mayor and treasurer of the town from paying to the Washington Water Power Company its monthly charges for electric energy furnished by it to the municipality for the producing of light and power for public uses. From a judgment denying relief, they have appealed.
The trial court found:
“That plaintiffs are now and were at all times herein mentioned residents and taxpayers of Brewster, Wash. That the defendant town of Brewster is a regularly organized and existing town of the fourth class of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Northport v. Northport Townsite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Besoloff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Shaw & Hodgins v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Miller v. City of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Prentice Packing & Storage Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Washington Fruit & Produce Co. v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Neel v. HenneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.