Legal Opinion

Watkins Incorporated v. Chilkoot Distributing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2013No. 11-3490PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Watkins, Inc. (“Watkins”) brought this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not breach its contract with Cecile (“Cec”), Lili, and Richard Willick, doing business as Chilkoot Distributing, Inc. (“Appellants”). Appellants raised various legal and equitable counterclaims. In the initial round of litigation, the district court 1 granted Watkins’s motion for summary judgment, finding a later agreement had superseded the parties’ initial contract, and dismissed all of Appellants’ legal and equitable counterclaims. We reversed and remanded, concluding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Avon State Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  3. HM Compounding Servs., LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
  4. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Marvin Architectural Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  5. Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. v. Finn Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API