Legal Opinion
Toussaint v. McCarthy
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 18, 1984No. C-73-1422 SAWPublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I. INTRODUCTION
The. following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law underlie the Court’s decision on the merits of a class action challenging the legality of conditions of confinement for prisoners held in administrative segregation — hereafter referred to as “segregation” — in the California State Prison at San Quentin (“San Quentin”) and the California State Prison at Folsom (“Folsom”). 1 The lengthy history of the litigation was recounted in some detail, in connection with the preliminary injunction entered in this case…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Frank Howard v. George Adkison and Henry JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.