Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Runnels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 2010No. 07-16736PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 12, 2010 is amended as follows. On slip opinion page 924, the following paragraphs are deleted:
Richardson focuses on his administrative segregation as a result of his suspected involvement with the Black Guerilla Family. California Code of Regulations Title 15 §§ 3335 and 3336 create a liberty interest in freedom from arbitrary segregation. Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080, 1097-98 (9th Cir.1986). To deprive Richardson of his liberty by segregation required an informal hearing in which he was informed of the charge and allowed to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- John Colwell v. Robert BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Donald Gravelet-Blondin v. Sgt Jeff SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Marty Cortez v. Bill SkolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Hernandez v. CateDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- John Colwell v. Robert BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.