Ex Parte Lawyers Sur. Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari review in this case primarily to review the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, with one Judge dissenting, that the surety for a conservator was absolutely liable for conservatorship losses, even though some of those losses could have been attributable to the actions of a successor conservator. As explained below, we reverse the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals on this issue, but we affirm its decision regarding the award of attorney fees and the taxation of costs.
The facts are adequately set out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 1 and we state only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Barnes v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lawyers Surety Corp. v. WhiteheadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ennis v. KittleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- State Dept. of Human Res. v. Est. of HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Jefferson County CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Lawyers Surety Corp. v. WhiteheadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998