Legal Opinion
Ennis v. Kittle
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 25, 1999No. 2980309PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jimmy R. Ennis and Brent Ennis, the defendants in an assault-and-battery action, appeal from an order taxing "court costs" to Bradford M. Kittle, the plaintiff. We reverse the trial court's order and remand for retaxation of costs.
Kittle brought an action against the Ennises in May 1997, alleging that the Ennises had assaulted and battered him. On May 13, 1998, more than 15 days before trial, the Ennises tendered Kittle an offer of judgment, pursuant to Rule 68, Ala.R.Civ.P., in which they offered to allow the entry of a judgment against them in the amount of $10,000. Kittle did not accept…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Knight v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ex Parte Mutual Savings Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Parkes v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pierce v. American General Finance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- State Dept. of Human Res. v. Est. of HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- D.D. v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Miller v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Ellison v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.