Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMoore, Chief Justice
Because Batson-Cook Company (“Bat-son-Cook”) must be liable to Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”), before Liberty Mutual *264Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) can be liable to JCI, I respectfully dissent.
I. The Terms of the Payment Bond Control
The majority opinion fails to address the operative terms of the payment bond between Batson-Cook and Liberty Mutual (“the bond”). “[Suretyship is a contractual relationship. Consequently, we begin our inquiry into the liability of [the surety] by reviewing the terms of the surety contract itself.” Ex parte Lawyers Sur. Corp., 719 So.2d 833, 835 (Ala.1998).…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Darks Dairy, Inc. v. Ala. Dairy Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.