Legal Opinion

Sakol v. Rickel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Martin Sakol against Henry Rickel for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff sues for negligent injury. The defendant is one of the firm of H. W. Rickel & Co., engaged in running a malt elevator in the city of Detroit. The plaintiff was employed in the elevator, which was separate from the rest of the establishment of defendant. Louis Kemm was foreman of the entire plant. Whenever it was necessary to start the machinery in the elevator, it was also necessary to let the grain into the hopper, and the starting of the machinery and the running of the grain in the hopper made up part of the duty of the plaintiff. The slide by means of which the grain was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Goodnow v. Walpole Emery MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Lamotte v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Barr v. Guelph Patent Cask Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Juchatz v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Neifert v. MetlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cressler v. King Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API