Legal Opinion
United States v. Weinberg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 22, 1973No. Nos. 72-1782-72-1785PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
The defendants appeal their sentences entered upon their conviction by a jury for conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2315 (1971). The alleged conspiracy was a plan to receive stolen securities and pledge them as collateral for a loan from a bank.1
I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE — THE JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT ELEMENT OF AN 18 U.S.C. § 2315 OFFENSE
18 U.S.C. § 2315 (1971)2 contains a jurisdictional amount element which requires the securities allegedly “received or disposed of” to have “the value of $5,000 or more.” The defendants maintain the Government failed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. WeinbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Joseph J. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- State v. HavertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Seville Industrial MacHinery Corp. v. Southmost MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- United States v. Ralph RussoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.