Legal Opinion

Farris v. McCracken

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

■Plaintiffs are' building contractors who were-, engaged by defendants ,to do extensive remodeling work in defendants’ home. Plaintiffs initially estimated that the proposed work would cost about $10,000. After partial completion and some additions to the original project' that estimate was increased to $11,500. The final,-and only, bill, submitted to defendants was nearly double that amount. Defendants had made some payments during the progress of the project but refused to pay the total bill-. Plaintiffs .filed a mechanics’ lien and this suit to foreclose followed. The trial court denied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dakin v. Queen City Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Parker v. HolmesArizona Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Aguirre-RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Midwest Fabrication, Inc. v. Woodex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. Aguirre-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Central Coast Electric, Inc. v. MendellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Desert Irrigation Co., Inc. v. TolmieIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API