Legal Opinion
Currieri v. City of Roseville
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1975No. Civ. 14162PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARAS, J.
In Currieri v. City of Roseville (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 997 [84 Cal.Rptr. 615], this court held that appellant Michael A. Currieri (hereinafter “appellant”) and John Zwolinski, 1 two police officers of the City of Roseville (hereinafter the “City”), had been improperly discharged, and ordered them reinstated to their positions, with back pay. The opinion concluded, “As petitioners concede, from any back payments due there must be deducted petitioners’ earnings from other sources. (Wiles v. State Personnel Board, supra, 19 Cal.2d 344, 352 [121 P.2d 673].)” (4 Cal.App.3d at p.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott Teutscher v. Riverside Sheriffs AssnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Carmen P. ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Wilkerson v. City of PlacentiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Bonn v. California State University, ChicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Fugitt v. City of PlacentiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.