Legal Opinion
Vanderlip v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 7, 1934No. 41993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Chief Justice.
The pertinent facts of this ease are stated in the findings and the opinion of the court. The record is not open to serious controversy, for it is made up as to vital issues involved upon documentary evidence. If the unlimited waiver of the statute of limitations executed in accord with section 250 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 265, is a valid and binding one, it is then apparent that the collection of the tax for which a refund is herein claimed was timely. To this issue the opinion of the court is addressed.
On October 2, 1921, the plaintiff’s attorney in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Oak Worsted Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Allen v. Galveston Truck Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Pittsburgh Can Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States v. MensikDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Wonder Bakeries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.