Legal Opinion
United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 5, 2013No. Nos. 1:11-CV-157, 1:11-CV-193PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants Animal Care Trust’s, Karen Walsh’s, Marvin Nicholson, Jr.’s, and Paula Hum’s (“Defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings (Court File No. 37).1 Plaintiff United Pet Supply, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) responded to the motion (Court Files No. 40), and Defendants replied (Court Files No. 46). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (Court File No. 37). Specifically, the Court denies Defendants’ motion with respect Fourth Amendment and abuse of…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Howe v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022