Swindler v. Butler Manufacturing Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELBORN, Commissioner.
Appeal by plaintiff from judgment in favor of defendant at close of plaintiff’s opening statement on trial for $50,000 damages for personal injuries. A prior appeal was found to be premature because the judgment appealed from did not dispose of all questions and parties. See Swindler v. Gross, Mo.Sup., 395 S.W.2d 109. The claim against codefendant Gross has now been dismissed and the issue between plaintiff and defendant Butler is now properly before us.
This cause of action arose out of injuries sustained by appellant Swindler while employed on the Gross farm in De-Kalb…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Bean v. Ross Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Jacob Blitzstein v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Jones v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Butcher v. MainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Winters v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Dean Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc., a Corporation v. Harold Munroe, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Intertel, Inc. v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Rodriguez v. Besser Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.