Cate v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Bobby J. Cate appeals an order determining that, had the results of DNA testing been available during his trial for aggravated sexual assault, it is not reasonably probable that he would not have been convicted. We affirm the order.
Background
In 2002, appellant was convicted of raping a woman he approached in the parking lot of a shopping mall in Lubbock and who offered to give him a ride in her vehicle. That conviction was based primarily on the victim’s identification of appellant. In other words, there was no forensic evidence offered to support the verdict.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Baggett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Booker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Asberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Pegues v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Austin Taylor Copple v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
- David Jones, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- David Jones, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.