Baggett v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.
After a jury trial in which appellant was convicted for the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault, appellant Richard Baggett, III, filed a motion for post-conviction DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex.Code CRIM. PROc.Code Ann. art. 64.01 (Vernon Supp.2002). The trial court granted appellant’s request; however, the test results were “inconclusive.” Based on this outcome, the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law that determined the DNA test results were “not favorable” to appellant. See id.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Rivera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Booker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Weems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Frank v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.