Gonzales v. Hodsdon
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
Respondent instituted this action for and on behalf of her eleven-year-old daughter, Cynthia Rae Gonzales, for recovery of general and punitive damages incurred because of alleged lewd and lascivious acts committed by appellant upon and against the person of the child. In his answer appellant admitted committing such acts but denied that they were committed maliciously or that the child was damaged in any way. At the conclusion of a jury trial, the jury returned a verdict of $25,000 general, but no punitive, damages in favor of respondent, followed by entry of judgment thereon.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jensen v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Mendenhall v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Riggs v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Gardner v. HobbsIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Northwest States Utilities Co. v. BrouiletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Village of Peck v. DenisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- McLean v. City of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.