State ex rel. Tucker v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals. In In re Hunt (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 378, 75 O.O.2d 450, 348 N.E.2d 727, paragraph two of the syllabus, we held that “[a] writ of habeas corpus will ordinarily be denied where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” An order revoking probation and imposing sentence is a final, appealable order from which an appeal is routinely taken. See, e.g., State v. McMullen (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 244, 6 OBR 312, 452 N.E.2d 1292; State v. Walden (1988), 54 Ohio App.3d 160, 561 N.E.2d 995.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. McMullenOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WaldenOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Gadsden v. LioiOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Coe v. McFaul, 89749 (5-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Russell, 89639 (4-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Perry v. State, Unpublished Decision (10-12-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State ex rel. Gadsden v. LioiOhio Supreme Court · 2001