Legal Opinion
State v. Walden
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1988No. 10757 and 10952, 10758 and 10951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, J.
These four appeals stem out of one case brought before the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Three defendants were each charged with four counts of securities law violations and one count of grand theft stemming from a securities fraud scheme. The two appealing defendants, James K. Brown and Charles M. Walden, were each sentenced to five concurrent one-year prison terms. The sentences were suspended and they were each put on five years’ probation. One condition of probation was to make restitution of the money stolen from the victims of the scheme. The defendants failed to pay the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DockeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Murillo, 21919 (1-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Tucker v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. Williams, 2007-Ca-28 (5-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Tucker v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.