Legal Opinion

Matson v. Lally

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the' Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

The appellees, before a justice of the peace, recovered a judgment against the appellant in an action of replevin, from which the appellant appealed to the Superior Court. There the appellees dismissed.the suit, but the court refused to award a retorno habendo. That refusal is assigned as error. The whole bill of exceptions, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:

“ Thereupon the counsel for the defendant requested the court to award to the defendant a writ of retorno habendo for the property replevied in this action; whereupon it was stated to the court by counsel for the plaintiffs, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. HarlanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago Consolidated Bottling Co. v. McGinnisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  2. Page v. Northwestern Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. West Chicago Street R. R. v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API