Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. Harlan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne County; the Hon. C. S. Conger, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtReeves, P. J.

The bill of exceptions incorporated in the record in this case, does not purport to contain all the evidence heard by the court below. The rule is too well established to be disregarded, thatwhere the bill of exceptions does not state that it contains all the evidence heard by the trial court, the Appellate Court will not be justified in looking into the record to determine whether the finding of the trial court was correct or not. Nimmo v. Kuykendall, 85 Ill. 476; James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654.

As to the first error assigned, that the court admitted improper evidence on the part of plaintiff,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. DexterIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Nimmo v. KuykendallIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matson v. LallyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  2. Deam v. LowyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API