State v. Almaraz-Martinez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction that required him to pay court-appointed attorney fees of $624 and from a supplemental judgment that required him to pay $2,909.05 in victim restitution. He contends that the record does not support either award. Defendant raises both challenges for the first time on appeal. We conclude that the rules of preservation do not apply to defendant’s restitution argument, because the record does not show that defendant had notice that the trial court would be considering the restitution request. We also conclude that there is no evidence to support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017