Legal Opinion
Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital Center
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1989No. 2689 and 2640PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge.
An order permitting the filing of interlocutory cross-appeals provides the basis for our consideration of the proper extent of discovery available to the parties in this case.
Appellants, the Stengers, ask us to consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to permit them to discover the identity of a blood donor, (Donor) and the identities of recipients of blood from this particular Donor. In a cross-appeal Appellant, Lehigh Valley Hospital Center, seeks review of that portion of the trial court order which directed it to disclose the delivery dates of blood it acquired…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- UNITED STATES of America v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Denoncourt v. Commonwealth, State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Arnold v. American National Red CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Snyder v. MekhjianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. DinelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Coleman v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.