Legal Opinion
Roffman v. Wilmington Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided March 6, 1962No. 43PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, J.:
The appellants, trading as Launderbest, leased from Brodsky Realty Co., Inc., appellee, the premises at 735 Lombard Street, Wilmington, in which they operated a laundry business.
The lease, inter alla, provided that all equipment installed by Launderbest for use in its business would remain its property with the privilege of removal upon the expiration of the lease. The lease further provided that in the event of the condemnation of the premises, or the sale of the premises by Brodsky to a public authority, the lease would terminate. Upon such termination Launder-best waived “all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Des Moines Wet Wash Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rushton v. SheaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Lexington Insurance v. RaboinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
- Schwartzman v. WeinerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- IMPROVED PARCEL OF LAND, ETC. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Land-Lock, LLC v. Paradise Property, LLC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.