Legal Opinion
People v. Benjamin
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1999No. C031137PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion.KOLKEY, J.
After the trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) and for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154 [98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667] (hereinafter Franks), defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359) and cultivation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) in exchange for a grant of probation.
Defendant now appeals, contending that he made a showing sufficient" to require an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks, supra, 438 U.S. 154. In Franks, the United…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- People v. Iliya CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Larsson CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014