Legal Opinion

Andrews v. State Ex Rel. Saye

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1920No. 9734PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by the State on the relation of Ben E. Saye, County Attorney, against Brooks Andrews, Bert Tucker, and another upon a forfeited appeal bond. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants named bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

The state of Oklahoma, as plaintiff, obtained a judgment in the dis-rrict court of Jefferson county in the sum of $500 on a forfeited appeal bond against the defendants, H. D. Anderson, as principal, and Brooks Andrews and Bert Tucker, as sureties, from which the defendants Andrews and Tucker haye appealed to this court.

The defendant Anderson was convicted in the county court of Jefferson county of maintaining a gambling house, from which judgment he appealed to the Criminal Court of Appeals of this state. For the purpose of staying execution he executed the super-sedeas bond on which this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. LittrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Duree v. State Ex Rel. GlennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API