Legal Opinion
Sutton v. State Ex Rel. Selby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 2, 1922No. 10628PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This is an action brought to recover the sum of $500 upou a forfeited appearance bond executed by A. L. Sutton, as principal, and J. Co.ody Johnson,' A. H. Tyson, and T. H. Traylor, as' sureties, given to answer a charge in the county court of Oklahoma county.
The petition is in the ordinary form 'of actions of this character, and no complaint is made of the sufficiency thereof. The amended answer, after admitting the execution of the bond for the appearance of A. L. Sutton at the next term of court, avers that the case of the state of Oklahoma against A. D. Sutton was set for trial on the 7th…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pearce v. OlneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Smith v. LowryNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Kent v. RicardsHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Addington v. State Ex Rel. PruetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Trimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Byrd v. MarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Billingslea v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Billingslea v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953